Is creation out of nothing biblical? Did God create the whole cosmos from something or from nothing? Let’s see. God is self sufficient. He is complete. He does not need anybody. He needs nothing. God does not need to create. We exist because God chose for us to exist. Creation is an expression of God’s will. He willed that we have life. “By your will they were created and have their being.” (Rev. 4:11)
God “calls things that are not as though they were” (Rom. 4:17). God did not create out of some pre-existing “spirit substance.” Apart from God who is Father, Son and Holy Spirit, there was no one else and there was nothing else (material or “spirit substance”) before he created anything. Before creation existed, there was nothing apart from God who is Father, Son and Holy Spirit. To say that God who is Father, Son and Holy Spirit needed a “spirit substance” to create is to say that there was “something” (a “spirit substance”) apart from God that pre-existed and co-existed with God before anything was created.
God Created All Things From Nothing
God created everything from nothing, absolutely nothing. He did not need any spirit substance of which he is dependent on in order to create. He needed nothing at all in order to create. All it takes is a command from God by God’s will and they came to be. “For he commanded and they were created” (Psalm 148:5).
Our existence depends entirely on God’s will. We exist because God’s will keeps us in existence. “For in him we live and move and have our being” (Acts 17:28). If God wills differently, man will cease to exist.
In discussing the creation of the world, we are discussing nothing mechanical. One cannot find the start of life in matter. From matter to atom to neutron, electrons, etc.—to start of life. Scientists are misguided in thinking that they can find the start of life in matter.
Creatio Ex Nihilo
Creation is God’s will expressed in the Father’s decision; The Son is the wisdom of God, the Logos of God, the Utterance of God, the “orderer”; The Holy Spirit is the breath of God that pervades everything and gives life, the “mover.”
Creation is out of nothing—creatio ex nihilo—and rests entirely on God’s will. The universe is exactly what the Father has willed, what the Son has ordered, and what the Holy Spirit has moved.
Penitent on Good Friday – This man’s blood splattered on the side of my car, my left hand and my short pants as he whipped himself. (Click to zoom)
Although the Catholic Church officially discourages penitents from practicing crucifixion and beating themselves up (self-flagellation) to atone for their sins, this long-held tradition continues in the Pampanga province among devoted Catholics. I heard that today, Good Friday, March 29, 2013, there were about 24 penitents who were nailed to their individual crosses.
Zeal for God
I do not want to be judgmental and question the motives of these devotees — my very own countrymen. I know many of them are very sincere in their devotion to God. God knows the inner thoughts and intents of their hearts. Instead, I look at them with respect and understanding. I’m actually fascinated by their zeal and dedication to reach out to God and to atone for their sins. Every year as I see this happening, I am reminded of St. Paul’s anguish over his very own people—the Jews—some two thousand years ago who were being destroyed for lack of knowledge. This was somewhat a similar situation back then. Paul said:
“Brothers, my heart’s desire and prayer to God for the Israelites is that they may be saved. 2 For I can testify about them that they are zealous for God, but their zeal is not based on knowledge. 3 Since they did not know the righteousness that comes from God and sought to establish their own, they did not submit to God’s righteousness. 4 Christ is the end of the law so that there may be righteousness for everyone who believes.” (Romans 10:1-4)
Missing the Mark
I feel the same way when I see my fellow countrymen who are zealously trying to reach out to God but are missing the mark for lack of knowledge. They need to know who the real Jesus really is who loves them so much such that he died for them. A penitent should see the truth that he does not need to literally beat himself up and nail himself to the cross each and every year! Truly, “people are destroyed for lack of knowledge” (Hosea 4:6).
Christ Died Already
St. Paul said, “While we were still sinners, Christ died for us” (Romans 5:8). Christ was already crucified for us! And Christ did it because he loves us. He loves all of us! We don’t need to crucify ourselves literally on the cross each year in order for God to love us. He already loved us even while we were still sinners! He continues to love us until now and forever!
Believe the Good News!
Let us believe this present reality that Christ was crucified and he died for us while we were still sinners. There is no need for us to pay for our own sins. Christ did it. It’s finished. Let us believe the truth that God loves the whole world so much that is why God is not willing that any should perish. Let’s change our thinking (repent) and believe the truth — the true gospel — Christ was crucified and already died for you! Believe it and enjoy life and love in Jesus for all eternity!
This is how the Trinitarian theology doctrine developed in the Grace Communion International(GCI) which was formerly called the Worldwide Church of God (WCG) from my own experience as a church member in the Philippines beginning 1972 up the present. This is not a comprehensive history of how the incarnational, Trinitarian theology developed at GCI but rather a brief story of my own personal experience with it.
Trinity Doctrine Pagan
One of the major doctrines which I learned and believed in when I became a member of the Worldwide Church of God as a teenager in 1972 was that the Trinity doctrine was of pagan origin. We believed that the Trinity doctrine was a heretical and false idea. It had its roots from Nimrod I was told. We really believed we were right and I held on to that belief for some 18 years or so until a booklet was published around 1990 with the title, “God is…“ That booklet changed everything and many church members were shocked and outraged by it. Many left the church. It was a doctrine that introduced the Trinity doctrine as biblical truth which was totally contrary and opposite to the previous WCG belief taught by Herbert W. Armstrong.
Initial Exposure to Doctrinal Changes
My wife and I with Joseph Tkach Jr. in his home in Pasadena. He was then Director of Church Administration – US. He is the current president of Grace Communion International.
Back in 1987, as a young ministerial trainee, I and my wife had the privilege of attending a WCG ministerial conference in Pasadena, California. That was my very first exposure to the beginnings of various changes that would happen at WCG and that would continue from then on. I had the privilege to go back to Pasadena for another ministerial conference two years later in 1989. I heard more changes that were going on in the WCG’s faith and practice.
I remember that during that time, Dr. Mike Feazell was already explaining to us quite a number of errors in our Plain Truth magazine and in our other literature. He explained to us what we ministers ought to teach and preach instead. At that time, most of our WCG literature were all going through edits and revisions and some literature were pulled out of circulation.
The current GCI president, Dr. Joseph Tkach and me in Tagaytay, Philippines in February 2006.
As an ordained minister, I had the privilege of being informed regularly about what was going at WCG on a weekly basis by Dr. Joseph Tkach himself, our current GCI President. Back then, he was the Director of Church Administration and he kept us informed of the latest developments in the WCG every week. Many members had left since then but I believed and embraced the changes that were being introduced. I knew what was really going on and the changes were sound and biblical to me.
Ministers Learn About Trinity Doctrine
Dr. Stavrinides with my wife and I in Tagaytay, Philippines in 1994.
Sometime in 1993 and 1994, Dr. Kyriakos J. Stavrinides, a Greek theologian and classics professor from Ambassador College along with Dr. Joseph Tkach and others came to the Philippines for 2 consecutive years to explain to all of the WCG Philippine ministry the Trinity doctrine, the nature of God and what theology was all about. Most of us did not know about these things. Most of us did not go to seminaries. It was our first exposure to theology and the nature of God. It was a difficult time for many of the Philippine ministers. Many have left since then. It was my first time to hear that there was such a word as “Hermeneutics” which was introduced to us by Greg Albrecth of the Plain Truth Ministries. It was a challenging time for many of us trying to understand the new doctrines being explained.
How Doctrinal Changes Developed
As part of his lecture, Dr. Stavrinides explained to us how the doctrinal changes actually developed. Here is how it actually happened based on my notes from his lectures in 1994.
In our Plain Truth magazine and in our other publications, we have always said that the Trinity doctrine was false and was of pagan origin. A priest from New Jersey reacted to this and wrote to the then Pastor General Joseph W. Tkach Sr. in 1988. Another priest from Spain also reacted to a WCG publication in 1989. In 1990 a book entitled, “Another gospel” came out attacking the WCG. Because of all these negative reactions, Dr. Stavrinides was asked to help in crafting an official church statement on the deity of God. As a result, the Worldwide Church of God was removed from the list of cults. According to Dr. Stavrinides, WCG back then responded to critics by using weak and erroneous arguments.
In October 1990, a paper on the Trinity was published and the critics did not stop to criticize WCG. In November 1990, an article in the Plain Truth magazine was published with the title, “Who Was Jesus’ Father?” According to Dr. Stavrinides, the content of that article was in error.
He also said that he did not write the booklet, “God is…“ as some have wrongly supposed. According to him, people were upset about the booklet because it said that God is not as Herbert W. Armstrong (HWA) had thought of him. The booklet was right in saying that “God is one being” contrary to the old WCG belief that the Father and Jesus Christ are two God beings. Dr. Stavrinides added that the root of the problem was the lack of education of the readers regarding the subject.
Why WCG Changed its Doctrine
It was because of those priests, theologians and other critics who challenged the WCG view against the Trinity doctrine that made Pastor General Joseph W. Tkach Sr. respond by creating a doctrinal committee to refute them. At that point in time, he was sure that the WCG view was correct.
But as it turned out, the doctrinal committee found out from their studies that the critics were right about the Trinity doctrine after all! To be true and faithful to Scripture, that is why the doctrinal changes were made. Herbert W. Armstrong always taught: “Don’t believe me, believe the Bible!” That is exactly what WCG did when the error was pointed out.
That started the changes in the Worldwide Church of God. That’s how it happened as I learned it from others like Dr. Joseph Tkach, Dr. Mike Feazell, Dr. Dan Rogers as well as from Dr. Stavrinides. There was no conspiracy to change doctrine just for the sake of changing doctrine and stamping out the memory of HWA. We continue to love and respect HWA but he was not free from error too.
Personally, Dr. Stavrinides helped me a great deal in my initial understanding of the Trinity doctrine leading to more knowledge and understanding as I learned from others as well over the years. I heard he retired already and went back to Greece, his home country. I haven’t heard about him since then.
Healing Doctrine Changed
Back in 1989, I remember that one major doctrine that was changed was on our view on healing. We used to believe that going to doctors and taking medicine was a lack of faith. A booklet, “The Plain Truth about Healing“ was published and this was already a major change even before Pastor General Joseph W. Tkach shocked the whole worldwide denomination with major doctrinal changes which he publicly announced in December 1994. This booklet can still be found in our GCI website in several chapters. Church members in huge numbers left the church after December 1994. They forgot or they didn’t know that even HWA made changes in doctrine too. HWA changed the observance of Pentecost from Monday to Sunday in 1974. I was a new member in the church when Pentecost was changed.
With Pastor General Joseph W. Tkach Sr. in Pasadena, 1987.
Pastor General Joseph W. Tkach Sr. announced the major doctrinal change in December 1994 regarding the Sabbath and the festivals. We no longer have to keep the Sabbath and the festivals contrary to the teachings of Herbert W. Armstrong. That’s when the income and membership of the church dropped very drastically when a lot more members left causing a lot of hurts, misunderstanding, splits and the start of more splinter groups.
Forced to Study Again
Since we were told that we made errors in our doctrines because we did not know how to properly interpret Scripture, I thought it was a good idea to learn all about it. So I took a summer class in 1996 on Hermeneutics and Theological Methods at the Asian Theological Seminary. Regional Director Bill Sidney encouraged me to study further which led me to enroll as a student in Biblical Studies at the Asian Theological Seminary in 1997. Since I was an irregular student, I graduated after some five years in 2001. To me, it further confirmed my belief that the doctrinal changes in my denomination were on the right track. This interest in Biblical Studies eventually led me to get interested in Theology.
Personal Outlook on the Changes
Here’s how I look at it. Where can you find a whole denomination that is willing to change to adhere to the biblical truth unmindful of the consequences namely: 1) loss of millions in income, 2) loss of thousands of members? That’s my denomination, GCI, transformed by truth. Transformed by the Lord Jesus Christ! We stand for the truth regardless of consequences. We were liberated from error. Thanks be to the Lord Jesus Christ!
First-ever Trinitarian Theology Conference
After the first-ever Trinitarian Theology Conference, I visited the GCI world headquarters at Glendora in August 2007. Dr. Mike Morrison asked me to point where the Philippines is located on the world map.
We began to learn more about Trinitarian theology in the years that followed. In 2007, I had the rare privilege of being able to attend the first-ever GCI Trinitarian Theology Conferencein Palm Springs, California. That was my first time to hear Dr. C. Baxter Kruger in person. I was fascinated with what I learned there! (Sad to say, I lost all my photos of that conference! I accidentally deleted all of it from my computer!)
God surely was guiding and leading me along with the rest at GCI since the changes started for me in 1987. Beginning in 2007, I began to hear about Trinitarian theologians like Robert F. Capon, Thomas Torrance, Karl Barth and others. It was interesting for me to know that there were others who also believed in what we have newly-discovered to be the truth! We didn’t know that the “new truth” that God was allowing us to see had a name! They call it “Trinitarian theology!” Recently, our denominational leaders suggested that we call it “Incarnational Trinitarian Theology.”
A photo of me and Dr. Mike Feazell, vice president of GCI in Tagaytay sometime in 2010.
In February 2010, Dr. Mike Feazell, vice president of GCI, visited us in the Philippines and he also explained to all the GCI Philippine ministry what Trinitrarian theology was all about. He answered many questions from the pastors. I regret that he had to retire that soon. We’re both retired now from full time ministry. I consider him as one of my mentors since 1987 along with Dr. Joseph Tkach. I learned a lot from their writings and from hearing from them personally.
Ted Johnston and me during a Trinitarian Theology Conference in Cebu in 2012.
Last December 2012, Ted Johnston, GCI Ministry Developer and Communications Coordinator from GCI headquarters, also explained Trinitarian theology further to the GCI Philippine pastors and leaders gathered in three areas at Cebu City, Bicol and in Metro-Manila. I learned a lot as well from Ted Johnston through his emails since 1995 and even up to now through his blogs. I was glad to get to talk to him in person last December. I met him in 2007 in Palm Springs during the conference but he didn’t know me then personally. He only knew about me through emails. I also consider him as one of my mentors in Trinitarian theology. Be sure to read his blogs!
With Dan Rogers, former director of GCI Church Administration during a Trinitarian Theology Conference in Baguio City in 2012.
Back to back with Ted Johnston, Dr. Dan Rogers, the director of GCI Church Administration back then also visited the GCI Philippine ministry last December 2012 and also explained Trinitarian theology to all the pastors and leaders gathered in Baguio City. He also related to all of us the historical development of our Trinitarian theology and I was glad to hear that it matched perfectly well with what Dr. Stavrinides related to us years ago. He even added more information leading to our current understanding of this doctrine.
Theology is a Journey
With Dr. Gary & Cathy Deddo, President of Grace Communion Seminary. (Baguio City, September 2017).
Beginning in 2010 and even a few years before, I began to hear about Dr. Gary Deddo, the Founding President of the T. F. Torrance Theological Fellowship. He is now part of GCI and is our doctrinal adviser. Through his writings and videos, he has been of great help as well to me in my continuing study and journey to know the Lord Jesus more and more. He and his wife are a blessing to our denomination at GCI. I have learned a lot more since then and I still am learning! It was great to meet them personally recently.
Well, it’s been quite an exciting and challenging journey filled with both joy and sorrow. Despite the many explanations, seminars and lectures, some still continue to struggle to understand what Incarnational Trinitarian Theology is all about. I guess that would always be the case. We just have to continue growing in the grace and knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ.
I thought I’d write my own version of what happened and what’s happening and I hope this is worth something if not for many, at least for some.
Have I arrived already? Do I know everything already? No. I find that I have a lot more to learn from my teachers and from the Lord Jesus Christ through the Holy Spirit.
Some people claim that using “human reasoning” is wrong and that one should only rely on God’s Word. They claim that if it is not explicitly mentioned in the Bible, then it must be false. You have to produce the verse and the chapter or else, it’s not the “truth” according to Scriptures.
It is important that we understand what is implied truth and what is explicit truth found in the Bible. If we are not careful, we may think that all truths in the Bible are all only those explicitly stated. But that’s not the case at all. The Bible is not written neatly like a catalog or a list of clearly defined doctrines. We may have to dig deeper to mine the truths here and there in Scripture.
Here’s an example: Genesis 1:1 says, “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.” What is explicit in this statement? Well, clearly that “God created the heavens and the earth” as explicitly stated. God created the whole universe. That’s clear.
But is there something implied in this statement? Yes there is—that God is Creator as clearly implied by that same statement.
How did we arrive at such a conclusion that God is Creator in Genesis 1:1? Well, by using our God-given human reasoning power! It is not wrong to use it.
Of course, it goes without saying that if we rely only and solely on our own human reasoning power without God’s guidance through the Holy Spirit, then we may go astray from the right path.
But clearly, we have to use reason and both the implied and the explicit statements should be considered. We have to consider the immediate context and the larger context of the passage under discussion if we are to arrive at a correct understanding of what God is truly saying in that particular passage of Scripture. Many truths in the Bible can be derived and deduced from what is implied aside from explicit statements.
Some people believe that the Bible should only be interpreted literally. They do not understand nor are they able to distinguish in the Bible what figurative language is all about. They don’t know the difference between literal and figurative language. So, what is figurative language anyway?
Figurative Language Explained
In his book, “The Liberation of the Worldwide Church of God,” Dr. J. Michael Feazell, relates how he and Dr. Kyriakos J. Stavrinides explained this matter regarding figurative language on pages 30-31:
“During one discussion about the anthropomorphic references to God in the Old Testament, a panel member asked, ‘What does ‘figurative’ mean?’
‘Well,’ Kyriakos Stavrinides began to explain in his characteristically patient manner, “when a word or expression is used in a figurative sense, it is painting a picture of a reality that cannot adequately be described in literal terms.’
‘But why don’t we just take the Bible for what it says?’ was the sincere response.
‘When the Bible uses figurative language, that is what the Bible is saying,’ I offered in response. ‘Figurative language doesn’t imply that the statement is less true. It simply means that the statement is to be understood figuratively, not literally. In other words, it is a true statement, and it is to be understood figuratively, not literally.’
‘I’m totally lost. I guess I just don’t understand how something that isn’t real can be true.’
‘Let me give an illustration,’ Stavrinides offered. ‘If I say to my wife, “You are a rose,” I have made a true statement, and I really mean what I say. She is lovely and pleasing, just as a rose is lovely and pleasing, though in different specific ways. I do not mean she is literally a rose. I mean that there are certain important characteristics of a rose that my wife shares.”
Literary Context
A poem or a song is usually written with lots of figurative language. For example, the lyrics, “You are the sunshine of my life” is using figurative language. We can all easily understand that this Stevie Wonder song should not be interpreted nor should be understood literally. It is meant to be understood figuratively. And it doesn’t have to mean it’s falsehood or lying. Truth can be conveyed using figurative language.
